Corrections

Every number on this site comes from a document I can point to:

Spotted a mistake, or have a document I should see? Write to daredavil239804@gmail.com with the page, the claim and, if you can, a source. I reply within 7 days and note every fix on the page.

Email a correction

Share this page

Please check the linked source before you forward a figure.

Kalsubai peak rising above farm fields
Kalsubai, the highest peak in Maharashtra · Photo: Wikimedia Commons

Voices

What people in the affected villages say, and what the consent process recorded. Anything not in an official document is attributed by name.

14 records

14 places

5 projects

Project

Voices

pesa not followed AllegedNot yet reviewed

Four objections: no PESA and Fifth Schedule areas In tribal-majority 'Scheduled Areas', the 1996 PESA Act gives gram sabhas a say over land acquisition and resources. More in glossary → Gram sabha The assembly of all adult voters of a village; under FRA and PESA its consent is needed for some decisions on land and forests. More in glossary → approval; Fifth Schedule land cannot be acquired; Forest Rights Act (FRA) The 2006 law that recognises tribal and forest-dwelling communities' rights over the land and forests they use. More in glossary → rights not settled; no LARR rehabilitation identified.

Said by Kiran Lohokare
📍 Bhorande PSP area (Fifth Schedule) · Mahadeo Koli · Thakar · Katkari
Sources (1)

hearing postponed Reported

Over 500Reported“…s and agitations grew stronger. Ultimately, the Maharashtra Pollution Control Board (MPCB) postponed the public hearing when over 500 people from Junnar gathered to protest outside their office in Pune, on August 17. Suresh Wajage, a Junnar resident, ended his ni…”Sanctuary Asia people protested; the 21 Aug Public hearing A meeting near the project site, run by the state pollution control board, where affected people can object on record. More in glossary → was postponed and Suresh Wajage ended a nine-day hunger strike.

Said by Sanctuary Asia reporting
📍 MPCB office, Pune ·
Sources (1)

Protest Reported

Residents of Dhak and Potal protested and demanded cancellation, saying the project harms livelihoods and natural resources.

Said by Residents of Dhak and Potal
📍 Karjat tehsildar office ·
Sources (1)

hearing outside area AllegedNot yet reviewed

Residents learned at the last minute of a public hearing held in Gaurkamt, a village outside the affected area.

Said by Adv. Kailash More, Karjat Taluka Paryavaran Bachao Samiti
📍 Gaurkamt (outside Karjat project area)
Sources (1)

gram sabha ignored AllegedNot yet reviewed

A gram sabha passed resolutions against the project; Torrent has not clarified its status. No community impact assessment was done and only 100Alleged“Citing the “executive summary of the project”, he claimed only 100 jobs will be created during the operation phase of the project.”ThePrint operational jobs are listed.

Said by Prasad Dekhmukh
📍 Karjat taluka
Sources (1)

rr not provided Documented

About 144 haDocumented“…orage hydropower project planned by Torrent Power Ltd . The project, covering a total of 370 hectares (233 ha of forest area and 144 ha of non-forested area), will comprise of two reservoirs. The upper reservoir will be constructed on the hilltop with maximum da…”Land Conflict Watch of private land to be acquired across six villages (Dhak 73.55 haDocumented“Bhaliwadi (2.29 ha), Ambot (1.34 ha), Potal (6.87), Pali (48.14 ha), Saidongar (11.79 ha) and Dhak (73.55 ha)”Land Conflict Watch, Pali 48.14 haDocumented“Bhaliwadi (2.29 ha), Ambot (1.34 ha), Potal (6.87), Pali (48.14 ha), Saidongar (11.79 ha) and Dhak (73.55 ha)”Land Conflict Watch). No household count published; Rehabilitation and resettlement (R&R) What a project must provide to people who lose homes, land or livelihoods. More in glossary → declared not applicable.

📍 Dhak, Pali, Saidongar, Potal, Bhaliwadi, Ambot
Sources (1)

water rights AllegedNot yet reviewed

Villages that already face water scarcity fear the project will worsen shortages while benefits flow to cities.

Said by Adv. Kailash More; residents (via Land Conflict Watch)
📍 Karjat, Badlapur, Ulhasnagar
Sources (2)

survey without permission AllegedNot yet reviewed

Residents say Environmental impact assessment (EIA) The study a developer must commission on a project's effects on land, water, wildlife and people before it can get an EC. More in glossary → survey permissions were never obtained; strangers taking measurements were chased away. The district has not shared proof of permission.

Said by Adoshi residents
📍 Adoshi (Bhorande PSP upper reservoir) Mahadeo Koli · Thakar
Sources (1)

fra rights ignored Reported

Ganpat Mengal, a Thakar Adivasi, holds Individual Forest Rights on land proposed for the lower reservoir, plus Community Forest Rights awarded in 2019.

Said by Ganpat Mengal (as reported)
📍 Bhorande (lower reservoir site) Thakar
Sources (1)

no response Reported

Pune and Thane Collectors, Adani Green, THDC, MPCB and the Forest Department did not respond to requests for comment.

Said by Sanctuary Asia
📍 Pune and Thane
Sources (1)

displacement ReportedNot yet reviewed

In a Scheduled Area, 10Reported“There shall be 130 affected families of which 10 shall be displaced families. The acquisition”EAC 30th meeting minutes, 30 Apr 2025 (Bhavali EC), page112 · 30 April 2025 families face displacement and 130Reported“There shall be 130 affected families of which 10 shall be displaced families. The acquisition”EAC 30th meeting minutes, 30 Apr 2025 (Bhavali EC), page112 · 30 April 2025 are affected; no gram sabha consent process has been sought.

Said by Research dossier (FAC/Parivesh records)
📍 Kalbhonde, Kothale, Jamunde (Igatpuri/Shahapur)
Sources (1)

gram sabha ignored AllegedNot yet reviewed

“There was no public hearing on the project before the permission was granted.”

About 110 villagesAlleged“…ion_pumped_hydro_projects_to_impact_biodiversity_hotspot (18 July 2024) Kolhapur villagers oppose Adani PSP Residents of nearly 110 villages in Kolhapur have opposed the pumped hydropower project coming up at Anjiwade village, in Kudal tehsil of Sindhudrug dist…”SANDRP: 2024 concerns opposed; activists say no public hearing preceded permission. Patgaon dam is the only water source for hilly Bhudargad tehsil.

Said by Samrat More (activist)
📍 Bhudargad (Kolhapur) / Kudal (Sindhudurg)
Sources (1)

gram sabha ignored AllegedNot yet reviewed

Farmers and gram sabhas say consultation under FRA was inadequate and the project was presented as an irrigation dam rather than a peak-power plant.

Said by Farmers and gram sabhas (as reported by Karmactive; low-reliability outlet)
📍 Karjat and Khalapur talukas
Sources (1)

Have a gram sabha resolution, hearing minutes or a statement I should add? Write to daredavil239804@gmail.com.